Apple AirPods Pro 2 Review: The Ubiquitous Sound Dilemma — Between Mass Appeal and Excellence

Can a product destined for mass production and global ear placement truly become a “first-class item” that withstands the demanding aesthetic judgment of audiophiles seeking genuine excellence? This question represents a fundamental dilemma we cannot avoid when discussing modern personal audio. And at the center of that debate stands none other than Apple’s AirPods Pro 2.

These small white earphones have penetrated our lives deeply not merely as electronic devices but as a cultural phenomenon. They elevated the act of listening to music into an unprecedentedly effortless, frictionless experience. However, what we should question lies beyond that convenience. What has this product achieved, and what has it sacrificed, in the philosophy of audio reproduction?

This article attempts to analyze the AirPods Pro 2 not merely as an aggregation of functions but at the level of its design philosophy. We’ll peer into the depths of computational audio woven by its heart—the H2 chip—and unravel the silence and particles of sound it brings forth. Simultaneously, we’ll apply a sharp scalpel to the tension between its remarkable technical achievements and the structural contradiction of “disposability” inherent in the product itself. This is also an attempt to redefine what constitutes “good sound” and “first-class products” in our era through the lens of a single product: the AirPods Pro 2.

Related Articles

A Practical Guide to Critical Listening

A comprehensive compass for world-class audio evaluation. Detailed exploration of terminology used in reviews, critical listening techniques, and the science behind perceptible differences that measurements cannot capture.

2025/08/05 Published

60 min read

Basics

#critical listening #audio evaluation #sound quality

A Practical Guide to Critical Listening

2025/08/05 Published

60 min read

Basics

critical listening audio evaluation sound quality

Apple AirPods Pro 2 — Overview

First, as the foundation for discussion, we need to organize this product’s objective specifications. The designer’s intentions can be glimpsed within the unadorned enumeration of numbers.

Manufacturer / Model: Apple / AirPods Pro (2nd generation) - Earbuds: A2931, A2699, A2698 / MagSafe Charging Case (USB-C): A2968 1
Release Date: September 23, 2022 (Lightning model), September 12, 2023 (updated to USB-C model) 1
Price Range: $249 USD/¥39,800 (tax included)[3,5]. However, market prices tend to drop to around $190-$200 6.
Key Specifications:
- Audio Technology: Apple custom high-excursion driver, custom high dynamic range amplifier, Active Noise Cancellation, Adaptive Transparency, Personalized Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking, Adaptive EQ 8
- Chips: Apple H2 chip (earbuds), Apple U1 chip (MagSafe charging case) 9
- Connectivity: Bluetooth 5.3 8
- Supported Codecs: SBC, AAC 10
- Sensors: Skin-detect sensor, motion-detecting accelerometer, speech-detecting accelerometer, touch control 9
- Sweat and Water Resistance: IP54 rating for dust, sweat, and water resistance (earbuds and charging case) 9
- Battery Life (ANC on): Up to 6 hours (earbuds), up to 30 hours (with charging case) 9
- Size and Weight: Earbuds (each): 30.9 x 21.8 x 24.0 mm, 5.3g / Case: 45.2 x 60.6 x 21.7 mm, 50.8g 9

Third-Party Review Aggregation and Bias Analysis

Relying solely on individual listening impressions risks falling into the swamp of subjectivity. To establish more objective evaluation criteria, let’s listen to critics and users worldwide and derive the product’s essence from that collective wisdom.

Media	Quote Excerpt	Rating	Source	Bias Analysis
CNET	”excellent overall for sound, noise canceling and voice-calling performance… why they remain one of our CNET Editors’ Choice award winners in the headphones category.”	★★★★☆	13	Mass Market Bias: CNET is a broad consumer-oriented media outlet, and its evaluation tends to emphasize convenience within the ecosystem and overall user experience over pure sound quality. “Editors’ Choice” reflects market success and doesn’t necessarily align with audiophile values.
MKBHD (YouTube)	“these AirPods are a significant upgrade and they’re just flatout better than I expected… really, really good.”	★★★★☆	14	Influencer Bias: MKBHD is a tremendously influential tech reviewer, but his perspective is that of a general technology enthusiast rather than an audio specialist. His enthusiasm is genuine, but he highly values experiences within the Apple ecosystem, and the fact that this is a review of a manufacturer-provided sample should be considered.
Reddit User	”The sound quality is improved, but not earth shattering. Definitely better bass… A major step up from the first AirPods Pro.”	★★★★☆	15	Confirmation Bias: As an upgrade from the first generation, psychological tendencies to justify one’s purchase easily come into play. However, it holds high value as a candid opinion uninfluenced by manufacturers. The assessment of “not revolutionary but definite evolution” seems a reasonable view shared by many users.
SoundGuys	”If you own an iPhone, the new AirPods Pro is an obvious choice… Android phone owners, we’d be throwing money away.”	★★★☆☆ (Android)	16	Measurement-Driven Bias: SoundGuys emphasizes objective measurement data. This evaluation accurately points out value reduction from losing key functions on non-Apple platforms. This isn’t biased reporting but a realistic, technically-based assessment highlighting the product’s strong ecosystem dependency.

Aggregation and Summary: After examining dozens of major reviews and forum discussions, evaluations are overwhelmingly positive, with a ratio of approximately 9 to 1 7. Praise consistently centers on three pillars: first, dramatically evolved Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) and transparency mode performance from the first generation; second, more refined and powerful sound; and third, unparalleled convenience brought by the Apple ecosystem.

Meanwhile, pointed-out shortcomings are also consistent: codec support limited to SBC and AAC, unrepairable disposable structure, and fit that isn’t comfortable for everyone. Deeply examining these lights and shadows will undoubtedly be key to understanding this device’s true value.

Design Philosophy Dwelling in White Housing

To understand the AirPods Pro 2, we need to illuminate it from three perspectives: not just its surface functions but its origins, internal structure, and market positioning.

From iPod to Pro: Evolution of Listening Experience

Apple’s audio product history isn’t merely a record of technological progress. It’s arguably a chronicle of consistent philosophical evolution about how we change our relationship with music.

In the iPod era, its mission was encapsulated in “1,000 songs in your pocket” 21. “Carrying” music—access to libraries—was the supreme imperative. However, when they eliminated the headphone jack and introduced the W1 chip with AirPods, Apple’s philosophy took a major turn. From “carrying” music to “living with” music. This was a clear statement of intent prioritizing seamless wireless integration over universal wired standards 23.

The appearance of the “Pro” designation suggests further evolution. It signified transformation from mere playback devices to devices that actively “edit” users’ auditory environments through sophisticated computational processing like ANC 24. The AirPods Pro 2 represents the current culmination of this philosophy. They redefined audio as an intelligent, environmentally-integrated utility.

H2’s Brain and Computationally-Created Soundscape

At the core of this experience lies the Apple H2 chip. This silicon brain serves as the driving force for noise cancellation performance touted as double the first generation, adaptive transparency that suppresses noise according to surrounding conditions, and low-distortion sound 12. This represents a brilliant victory of computational audio.

However, this power has a shadow side. While traditional hi-fi audio equipment maintains invariant acoustic characteristics once manufactured, the AirPods Pro 2 is a “variable platform” whose character can change through software. Forums report instances where specific firmware updates (like 6B34) unintentionally changed—sometimes degraded—ANC performance and sound quality 28. This conflicts with the “stability” and “predictability” that audiophiles value. Owners don’t hold final decision-making power over their equipment’s acoustic characteristics. This represents a significant philosophical departure from traditional audio equipment ownership models.

Pod Anatomy: Mechanical Beauty and Disposability Paradox

Internal structures revealed by CT scans and teardown reports are crystals of truly astonishing high-density implementation technology 26. Their design, born from the necessity of cramming vast technology into limited space, harbors a kind of “mechanical beauty.”

But this beauty is inextricably linked with cruel reality. This very meticulous design is what makes repair virtually impossible. Evaluations by repair specialists like iFixit unanimously declare them “unrepairable” 32. Particularly since battery replacement is impossible, this product carries the fate of being a consumable that degrades in performance after 2-3 years and requires replacement 35.

Here lies the greatest paradox this device carries. The AirPods Pro 2 are a marvel gathering the finest cutting-edge manufacturing technology, yet essentially disposable. This directly opposes the traditional audiophile spirit that values durability, repairability, and long-term value. Can we truly call a product premised on obsolescence within years “professional”? This question is thrust at our consumer culture itself.

Rivals as Mirrors

To clarify the AirPods Pro 2’s position, comparison with major market rivals is essential. This comparison table will highlight the trade-offs consumers face when making choices.

Feature	Apple AirPods Pro 2	Sony WF-1000XM5	Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds
Driver	Custom high-excursion dynamic	8.4mm Dynamic Driver X	Custom dynamic
Chip	Apple H2	Integrated Processor V2 + QN2e	Custom Bose chipset
ANC	Very excellent, adaptive	Very excellent, adaptive	Class-leading, adaptive
Supported Codecs	SBC, AAC	SBC, AAC, LDAC, LC3	SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive
Battery (ANC on)	6 hours (earbuds) / 30 hours (total)	8 hours (earbuds) / 24 hours (total)	6 hours (earbuds) / 24 hours (total)
Water/Dust Protection	IP54 (earbuds & case)	IPX4 (earbuds only)	IPX4 (earbuds only)
Connectivity	Bluetooth 5.3, seamless switching between Apple devices	Bluetooth 5.3, multipoint connection	Bluetooth 5.3, multipoint connection
Price	$249 / ¥39,800	$299 / ~¥42,000	$299 / ~¥40,000
Sources	1	36	39

As this table shows, while the AirPods Pro 2 lag in codec options, they possess unique strengths in dust protection including the case and within the Apple ecosystem. Meanwhile, Sony and Bose offer appeal as more open platforms with multipoint connectivity and high-quality codec support. The choice depends on users’ own philosophy about what to prioritize.

Auditory Exploration: Listening Impressions

Having considered technical specifications and others’ evaluations, it’s now time to explore that sonic world with our own ears. Here, let’s first quote voices from reliable critics and users as our auditory compass.

Reviewer / Outlet	Quote Excerpt	Source
What Hi-Fi?	”Clear, detailed and powerful sound… Smooth, intuitive use with iOS devices.”	17
Headfonia	”the uncanny sensation that before occurred when listening to jazz or rock music, where everything sounded too artificial, is now completely gone.”	42
Reddit user “Precise-Resolve-333"	"The Airpod Pros 2 are my most used audio product despite having much more expensive stuff. Partially due to convenience but mostly due to sound. The APP2 sounds better than 95% of all iems.”	19
Reddit user “jihaad"	"compared to the 1st Gen, they have lost some of the smoothness in the high, but have been improved in the low.”	43

These voices suggest this device isn’t merely a convenient gadget but a product worth serious musical engagement. Based on this premise, let’s deeply examine genre-specific listening impressions.

Critics’ Notes: Genre-Based Analysis

Classical: From orchestra’s grand scale to string quartet’s delicate textures, the AirPods Pro 2 renders with surprising clarity. Particularly noteworthy is the natural soundstage expansion when personalized spatial audio is enabled. However, attention must be paid to strange artifacts reported in some user forums, specifically in solo piano pieces 44. Described as “fireworks popping” micro-noise that seems to follow piano keystroke sounds in certain ranges, this might show limitations of digital processing where the H2 chip’s adaptive EQ over-reacts to simple configurations with few notes. While this phenomenon doesn’t always appear, its existence tells a story of unpredictability behind computational audio’s perfection. Overall, the particles of sound rising from silence demonstrate the high S/N ratio designers likely aimed for 45.

Jazz: As Headfonia notes, the “artificial resonance” felt in the first generation has receded, enabling more vivid musical experiences 42. Listening to Miles Davis’s “So What,” Paul Chambers’s walking bassline benefits from improved low-end reproduction capability 43, balancing quantity and definition. Rather than unclear booming, you can feel the texture of strings hitting the fingerboard. The interplay between Bill Evans’s piano and Cannonball Adderley’s saxophone is clearly delineated through excellent instrument separation performance. While it doesn’t perfectly recreate a smoky jazz club atmosphere, the soundstage is surprisingly wide for TWS (True Wireless Stereo) earphones, with sincerity felt in attempts to faithfully reproduce each instrument’s timbre.

EDM & Pop: This genre might represent the AirPods Pro 2’s true forte. Bass that one reviewer described as “nearly basshead territory” 46 has evolved remarkably not just in quantity but quality. In tracks like Daft Punk’s “One More Time,” kick drum attacks are tight while sub-bass undulations dive deep. Importantly, despite reproducing such rich low frequencies, vocal and synthesizer clarity in mid-to-high ranges remains completely uncompromised. This is likely evidence that the H2 chip’s advanced signal processing and newly designed drivers and amplifiers successfully maintain low distortion even at high volumes 27. As many users note, the stability where sound doesn’t break down even when volume is raised 47 represents an extremely important quality for comfortably enjoying modern pop music with compressed dynamic range.

Critical Evaluation: Scorecard

Integrating the analysis thus far, let’s score this device across multiple evaluation axes. This isn’t merely to determine superiority but to understand the multifaceted nature of its value.

Evaluation Axis	Score (/5)	Justification
Technical Performance	4.0	ANC and computational audio by the H2 chip are cutting-edge. Bluetooth 5.3 and IP54 rating are also excellent. However, codec support limited to AAC is an inexcusable flaw for audiophiles. While it supports lossless audio when combined with Vision Pro 12, this is ecosystem lock-in and must be marked down in pure technical evaluation.
Musical Charm	4.5	Very clear, balanced, and musically appealing for TWS. The leap from the previous model is significant 17. Adaptive EQ guarantees consistently comfortable listening experiences 18. While it might not reach the ultimate resolution or distinctive “flavor” of dedicated wired IEMs 50, its overall expressiveness is extremely high and doesn’t fatigue during extended listening.
Build Quality	3.5	Manufacturing precision is flawless—a marvel of high-density implementation 26. Material quality is also high. However, the glossy case scratches easily 35, and most importantly, its disposable design philosophy significantly drags down overall evaluation. Beautifully made yet destined to break.
Price-to-Value	4.0	The $249 price is competitive against Sony and Bose rivals 38. Considering the feature set for iPhone users especially, its value is high. However, short product lifespan due to non-replaceable batteries 34 damages value as a long-term investment, preventing perfect scores.
Future-Proofing / Repairability	1.0	Repairability is non-existent, rating near zero 32. Glued together and designed for replacement rather than repair. This opposes audiophile philosophy and is environmentally problematic. While firmware updates might add functionality, they also carry risks of unexpected changes 29. This represents the device’s greatest philosophical flaw.

Bias Check and Comprehensive Judgment: Overwhelming praise in mainstream media is understandable. The user experience provided by AirPods Pro 2 is so seamless and effective that it’s easy to overlook objective shortcomings. However, from our critical audiophile perspective, AAC codec limitations, lack of user EQ adjustment, and most importantly, disposable design philosophy aren’t minor footnotes but central elements forming the product’s identity. These points must be taken seriously in any earnest evaluation.

Conclusion: For Whom Do the Pods Sound

Through this extensive analysis, we finally arrive at the ultimate question: For whom are these earphones intended? And where does their raison d’être lie?

Recommended For:

Apple Ecosystem Residents: For them, no other choice is conceivable. The experience seamlessly moving between iPhone, Mac, and Apple Watch is a kind of “magic” that rival products can never replicate 51.
Daily Commuters & Travelers: The combination of class-leading ANC, surprisingly natural transparency mode, and compact case fitting in pockets becomes an ideal companion for navigating noisy modern society 53.

Not Recommended For:

Android-Loving Audiophiles: Many key functions aren’t available, and high-quality codecs like LDAC can’t be used. For them, rival products like Sony’s WF-1000XM5 would be far more rational and satisfying choices 16.
Sustainability-Conscious Consumers: Unrepairable disposable design becomes a major flaw both ethically and economically for those seeking longevity and repairability in electronics 34.
Pure Sound Quality Pursuers: For serious home listening, combinations of wired IEMs and DACs in the same price range would undoubtedly provide superior detail, resolution, and soundstage without Bluetooth audio constraints 18.

Future Prospects: This device’s story doesn’t end at purchase. Future firmware updates might further refine (or unexpectedly change) its sound quality and functionality 55. Also, replacing with third-party ear tips from companies like Comply or AZLA offers paths to fine-tune fit and sound quality to personal preferences 29. This might represent the small customization margin left to users in an otherwise closed product.

Overall Rating: ★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0)

In conclusion, the Apple AirPods Pro 2 is a masterpiece of technology and user experience. In the context of convenience and ecosystem integration, it deserves a perfect 5 stars. However, when weighed on the scales of audiophile philosophy that values openness, permanence, and ultimate fidelity, the closed ecosystem, limited codecs, and disposable design philosophy weigh heavily, settling the final evaluation at a not-quite-perfect but extremely powerful 4 stars.

This is a story of brilliant yet compromise-containing excellence.

References / Reference Links

Citations